Dear Conner,
First, allow me
say it was a pleasure reading your topic proposal. I too plan to write about
Mitt Romney's speech, as I'm sure you know by now. Anyway, as I was looking
over your proposal, I thought about some aspects that might be beneficial for
you to adjust in order to write a more refined paper.
At first, your paper made no sense to me at all, but after
rereading it and discussing it with you, my comprehension grew and I
understood. Perhaps to facilitate the conception of your topic you should create
a strong thesis that clearly states your intentions for the paper. As I
understood and we discussed, your thesis would be something like this: While
Obama had complaints from one source, Romney successfully addressed allegations
coming from many areas by his use of Kairyos and Pathos. Preceding this
statement with coherent and systematic ideas and observations about both speeches
would aid to the understanding of the topic as well as provide necessary
background information of the speeches and perhaps increase your authority and
improve ethos.
Your audience is a good one for your thesis, but I would
like to put forward the idea that you could expand your audience from opponents
of Mitt Romney to both Supporters of Mitt Romney and people on the fence about
him as president. As you are targeting people who are against Romney and are
trying to show them that he is not what he appears from various complaints, it
would not be too difficult to incorporate people who are not opponents because
they would be easier to sway to your view. For supporters, your evidence could
be used to reinforce their notions that Romney would be a great president. So,
if you would like to try that, it would open up your audience and increase the
amount of people you could have the potential to affect.
You said you were planning on using pathos and kairos
primarily, but you may want to add logos, citing the fact that he directly
addressed some of the issues that he was facing (his stance on women) in his
speech. It might give your essay extra depth.
I feel overall you have a good handle on this assignment and
you should do well.
Sincerely, Ryan
PS, I was confused about the length, when a blog entry
should be at least 300, but the paper said 150-200. I went with the blog
requirements to be safe. If I was wrong, please disregard the third paragraph
when determining word count. Thank you.
No comments:
Post a Comment