Friday, December 7, 2012

Blog 9


Through this course, my conception of “public discourse” has somewhat grown as I have become more open and involved in the world around me.  In high school, I had not paid much attention to public speakers other than having the thought of “what a waste of time” or “what a great speech!”  As I started really paying attention to what people have been saying, I have found it very interesting in analyzing the rhetoric people use to make their point.  With this year being home to such an important election, there was a world of persuasion out there to look at and attempt to understand.  While I was never particularly strong at distinguishing rhetoric, examples of it all around me soon became painfully obvious.  Through my new-found knowledge of rhetoric, I was able to (at least I believe I was able to) cut through some of the fluff and make determinations for myself about the true meaning behind what was being said.  Looking back at some of these election speeches, there are key techniques that I would have taken away from both presidential hopefuls.  President Barack Obama was much more gifted at conveying emotion and using that to his advantage when he spoke.  Through his entire campaign, he was able to reconnect with his target voters without having to bring up his past time in office.  Mitt Romney, on the other hand, had used rhetoric to convey his ideas towards a more logical audience.  While these techniques were both radically different, they were both fairly effective at being able to persuade their target audiences of their beliefs and ideas.  As of right now, there is no one person in particular who I would like to emulate in respect to their rhetoric.  I am more of a cut and dry person and would prefer to just get to the point rather than adding all the fluff.  That is one of the many reasons I would never be a successful politician. 

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Blog 9 -Ryan Kiefer. Spare. Reflection.


I believe I have done all the blogs adequately and on time. If, however, I have not, here is a supplemental entry.
My conception of Public discourse has changed in one major way, and that was in a political way. Through this class I learned two different areas in politics where rhetoric is very important. First, with the analysis of the presidential debates I opened my eyes to the methods people use when trying to get what they want. The use of eloquent language that covered the three main areas of rhetoric was very important, but I also learned that the speakers themselves, even if they didn’t write the speech, still had to deliver it in an effective way to incorporate half of Kairos. In the second writing assignment when I was writing about the hunting of wolves I learned how to write the type of paper that the presidential candidates were presenting.
Over all my change has been very little, but only because I had a class just like this my junior year in High School, AP Junior Literature. We even had the same text book. It was very good to have a review, though, and I feel now that what I learned will stay with me so that I will actually be able to use it.
I really did enjoy the speech that Mitt Romney gave, mostly because of his Kairos. If I could create his kairos and sentiment, but back everything up with the logos of Obama, I think that would be the ideal rhetorician to emulate.

Friday, November 30, 2012

Blog 8 - Bryan Smith

In response to TIME's review of The Dark Knight Rises, I agree on many points the author brings up. For example, Corliss states that "the film’s allusions to the Patriot Act and the decadelong incarceration of terror suspects in Guantánamo are obvious". I also saw these allusions and I believe that they make the movie relevant to current social and global times which is a major reason why the film and its predecessors are held to such high esteem. In our group, we decided that visual media attempts to entertain the audience through many different ways such as humor, drama, and action. The Dark Knight Rises accomplishes this goal as agreed by Corliss who says it is "the best, most troubling, assured and enthralling"superhero movie. This source evaluates the movie based on the story and plot twists, acting, and its relevance to today's world. I agree that these criteria are essential to a good superhero movie because it keeps the audience entertained and involved in the movie even after the film is over. I especially believe that the characterization and the way to actors portray the character are important to the success of the movie. Bane, who Corliss describes as "an immense hulk with an air of courtly menace" serves as the embodiment of terrorism with his sadistic plot to destroy Gotham just because he can. The article comes to the conclusion that the character of Bane plays an integral part in the movie's greatness, which I agree with wholeheartedly. Bane provides a unique challenge to Batman's physicality and morality when he must abandon his city for a brief time and watch it suffer.


Blog 8- Annotated Bibliography Source


As I am writing my rough draft, I am starting to agree with points that are brought up by Ben Walters in his Guardian article discussing Dr. Horrible’s Sing-along Blog. His was the first article I found that labeled Dr. Horrible as absurdist and therefore emblematic of other Joss Whedon (“Whedonesque”) series. Those referenced in the article include Angel and Buffy, the Vampire Slayer, but other works that fall into this category could range from its early modern archetypes: Albert Camus’s L’entranger or Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot, to contemporary viral videos: Funnyordie.com’s The Landlord or Schmoyo’s Autotune the News. These works are largely experimental, employ humor, and character driven wherein the audience is meant realize a truth about human nature. This realization is often in the face of fantastic circumstances e.g. Will Ferrell trying to reason with a foul-mouthed, alcoholic toddler, but purveyance of this theme can often transcend its outer nonsense.

Ben Walters’ article is more of a discussion of the creation/creative elements of DHSAB, but what he deems worthy of note in his evaluation supports his categorization. Apart from the previously discussed genre bending (see blogs 6-7), Dr. Horrible caters to the absurd by making many of the titular character’s failures an extension of his internet use. For example, Dr. Horrible’s video blogs, his way of almost advertising his criminal activities, are monitored by the LAPD and Captain Hammer causing one of his schemes to fall through. More figuratively, the eponymous doctor cannot talk to his crush because he cannot “find the time to find the words”, an issue alleviated by the digital communication. Even his weapon of choice, his freeze ray, suffers from a need to buffer, an agony shared by online video watchers everywhere.

The article’s analysis brings up ideas that certainly add to Dr. Horrible’s pedigree, but I am going to stick with webseries as my genre for now. One can easily enjoy the show without delving into these added meanings, and DHSAB’s effect on online visual media is far more quantifiable than its effect on fellow absurdist media. Till next time!          

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Blog 8- Ryan Kiefer: Response to source from annotated bibliography



I am here responding to a review of the Nightwish album Dark Passion Play. The Review is by Joshua Mackle and is hosted at Helium.com. For the most part I agree with his review and I certainly believe he evaluated the album in a fair and unbiased way. This album was a pivotal point in the history of the band, released after the first major break in the band with the replacement of the lead singer.
Because of this there are some major differences that needed addressing, primarily in the direct relationship of the two voice types, but also the feel of the music as a whole. First, the review touches on the vocal shift. It is plain that there is a major difference in the tonal qualities of the singers and that Tarja was much more powerful than Annette, but the review goes on to mention some of the highlights of Annette’s voice that allow it to stand out in a light of its own, particularly with the example of the final track, Meadows of Heaven. Here, the review says, her voice is just as powerful as Tarja’s, but sweeter and cleaner.
In response to the change in the bands encompassing nature, the review is a little skewed as it compares Dark Passion Play to albums that are several albums old. Nightwish is a dynamic band whose albums are all different and represent the change in sound produced by the band. The album before Dark Passion Play, Once, is most similar and the reviewer acknowledges this as he says that if the listener liked that album, they will like Dark Passion Play.
The major problem with this source is that it does not once mention symphonic metal but is more focused on comparing albums of Nightwish to each other and explaining features of Dark Passion Play and how they compare to previous sounds of Nightwish.

Monday, November 12, 2012

Blog 7 - Topic Consideration


At this point in time, I still have no idea what to write about for our third writing assignment.  I've been thinking about many different topics since the assignment was given, but have been procrastinating writing this blog because I do not even have a vague idea of what I would be interested in writing about.   I have considered many different television series, movies, and household services, but when faced with the challenge of writing about them, I have not been able to establish a decent topic.  Throughout this process, I have ruled out many popular titles such as: Burn Notice, Suits, American Chopper, Criminal Minds, Mythbusters, Sons of Guns, Pawn Stars, The Avengers, Taken one and two, and countless other movies and television shows.  As for services, Netflix stood out to me as a fairly decent topic, but I decided it was probably too common and would easily bore the audience.  With all of that being said, my main consideration for this assignment is the television series Gold Rush on Discovery Channel.  The show allows a glimpse into the life of a modern day gold miner.  I believe that some people may misunderstand this series as a production purely for viewer entertainment.   Although the purpose of any television show is to grab and hold the attention of viewers, this series has showed that the American dream is still alive and well.  A man can still risk it all for the hope of a better future.  When the series started, it followed a group of down-on-their-luck men who decided to leave everything in pursuit of gold in the Alaskan Klondike.  Their first season is full of mishaps and letdown, but the viewer is able to see this group of men grow together and eventually earn the title of Alaskan Gold Miners.  While Gold Rush is currently my most probable writing topic, that could still very well change in the near future.

blog 7

One genre I am considering writing about is the genre of MMORPG video games. This genre, standing for massive multiplayer online role playing game, includes games where players are able to log on and play with thousands of other people around the world and interact with them in many different ways. These games are very popular in today's culture with the most popular being World of Warcraft which has over 10 million monthly subscribers. I feel that often people misunderstand the genre because reviewers often do not pay attention to the social aspect of the game which I feel makes them very popular. Critics often only focus on game play and other interactions with the game's AI and scripted events. While this is an integral part of any video game, I feel the social aspect is of equal importance to whether a game is going to be popular or not. I feel that WoW is able to remain the most popular MMORPG of all time is due to its loyal community and the friendships that are built through the game or strengthened by it. One of the major reasons why I feel critics often miss this point is because they do not play the game, but instead look at it from the outside looking in. From this viewpoint they are unable to see the player interactions and the friendships developed. Objective viewers only see the game play and battles between computers and not other people and are unable to understand why the game has survived where others have failed.